III
1 / 10
Which of the following are appropriate actions by the architect during project closeout? Check the three that apply.
Explanation:Review attic stock quantities for conformance to specificationsAIA A201–2017 §3.11.1 requires the contractor to deliver attic stock; the architect verifies compliance.
Verify receipt of warranties and operations manuals from the contractorCloseout documentation is a condition of final completion under §9.10.
Evaluate whether training has been completed for systems requiring itArchitect reviews whether the contractor provided required training per B101–2017 §3.6.1.5.
Topic: Construction & Evaluation → Section 4: Project Closeout & Evaluation → 4.1 Review closeout submittals
2 / 10
During a project under the A101–2017 contract, the contractor includes an unapproved alternate in the pay application. The architect discovers this during their review. What should the architect do?
Explanation:A101–2017 Article 4 defines the contract sum, including accepted alternates. Payment can only be certified for approved scope; unapproved alternates are excluded unless formally added.
Topic: Construction & Evaluation → Section 2: Construction Observation → 2.2 Evaluate payment request and approval process
3 / 10
The contractor has completed work on the HVAC system but the commissioning report indicates airflow is 15% below specified values. The contractor requests payment for the mechanical work. What should the architect do?
Explanation:Under A201–2017 §9.4.1 and §12.1.1, the architect must not certify payment for work that does not conform to contract documents. Commissioning reports help verify this compliance.
Topic: Construction & Evaluation → Section 2: Construction Observation → 2.2 Identify and evaluate nonconforming work
4 / 10
The contractor submits a request for time extension due to unusually severe weather. The owner asks if this qualifies as a valid delay under the contract. What should the architect reference?
Explanation:A201–2017 §8.3.1 outlines conditions for valid time extensions due to weather. The contractor must demonstrate that the weather was unusually severe and could not have been anticipated.
Topic: Construction & Evaluation → Section 3: Administrative Procedures & Protocols → 3.2 Evaluate contractor delay and time extensions
5 / 10
During review of the G702 payment application, the architect notices that retainage is being calculated inconsistently between trades. The contractor says this is to help cash flow on labor-intensive trades. What should the architect do?
Explanation:A201–2017 §9.3 and A101–2017 Article 5 define retainage terms. Unless the contract is formally modified, retainage should be applied uniformly to ensure equitable financial control.
6 / 10
During construction, the contractor finds a buried fuel tank not shown in the documents. They immediately notify the owner but take no further action. The owner asks the architect to instruct removal. What is the most appropriate next step?
Explanation:AIA A201–2017 §3.7.4 requires the contractor to stop work and notify the architect upon discovering hazardous conditions. The architect must advise the owner, who is responsible for further investigation.
Topic: Construction & Evaluation → Section 2: Construction Observation → 2.1 Evaluate site conditions and safety
7 / 10
Which items are required for processing a valid Change Order using G701? Check the two that apply.
Explanation:Agreement on cost and time between all partiesA G701 Change Order reflects mutual agreement regarding modifications to cost, time, or scope.
Signatures of owner, architect, and contractorAll three parties must sign for the Change Order to be valid under A201–2017 §7.2.
Topic: Construction & Evaluation → Section 3: Administrative Procedures & Protocols → 3.1 Manage changes in the work
8 / 10
The contractor submits a pay application that includes stored HVAC equipment at an off-site warehouse. The owner is concerned about releasing funds before the units are installed. What should the architect do before certifying this portion of payment?
Explanation:AIA A201–2017 §9.4.2 permits payment for stored materials if the architect verifies they are properly stored, protected, and documented. Lien waivers and ASIs are not required at this stage.
9 / 10
A consultant refuses to respond to a contractor’s submittal, claiming it is the architect’s responsibility. The architect, in turn, is unsure whether this submittal falls within the consultant’s scope. What should the architect do?
Explanation:C401–2017 makes consultants responsible for reviewing submittals related to their discipline. The architect coordinates submittals per A201–2017 §4.2.4 but must clarify consultant scope first.
Topic: Construction & Evaluation → Section 3: Administrative Procedures & Protocols → 3.3 Review submittals
10 / 10
The contractor notifies the architect that a door hardware supplier missed a finish specified in the contract. The contractor proposes an alternative with a similar finish but different performance rating. What should the architect do?
Explanation:AIA A201–2017 §3.12.8 requires formal documentation and review of substitutions. Informal agreements or ASIs are not appropriate if the performance differs.
Your score is
Restart quiz